These holdings stay out of the change counts. A merger, demerger, or a corporate action without a usable ratio means the share change cannot be read as a buy or sell.
Upgrade the plan to view this stock.🔒Thermax Ltd.THERMAX
Capital Goods
−₹24.4 cr−100.0% shares
0
—
₹0
Exited
Increasing Chemicals exposure while reducing Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels.
Sector allocation, Feb 2026 → Aug 2026
Sector increasing mostChemicals
+10.7 pp
Sector reducing mostOil Gas & Consumable Fuels
−4.9 pp
Allocation change, Feb 2026 → Aug 2026, the same range as Capital Rotation.
Capital Rotation
Capital Rotation shows how the fund's disclosed portfolio exposure changed across sectors and holdings over the selected period. Monthly disclosures show changes in positions but do not identify the exact source and destination of individual transaction proceeds.
See where this fund has shifted portfolio exposure and which holdings drove those changes.
Current range: Last 6 Months
Over the last 6 months, the fund's largest allocation increase was in Chemicals (+10.7 pp), while Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels saw the largest allocation reduction (−4.9 pp).
Intersector Rotation
Changes in each sector's share of the disclosed portfolio between the start and end of the selected range.
Sectors with the largest changes in portfolio allocation over the selected period.
Feb 2026 → Aug 2026
Allocation reductionAllocation increase
3 other sectors · 3 with smaller moves
Power −2.6 pp · Consumer Durables −2.0 pp · Automobile and Auto Components −1.4 pp
Intrasector Rotation — Chemicals
Changes in individual disclosed holdings within a selected sector over the same period.
See which holdings gained or lost exposure within the selected sector.
Feb 2026 → Aug 2026
Within Chemicals, Solar Industries India Ltd. (new position) and Pidilite Industries Ltd. (new position) saw the largest disclosed position increases, while Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. (exit) was the largest position reduction.
Reduced / Exited0 reduced · 1 exited
Increased / Entered0 increased · 3 new
Ribbon width is the notional size of each disclosed share change: shares added or removed, valued at the Aug 2026 reference price. Ribbons join each holding to the sector, not to other holdings; disclosures do not show which sale funded which purchase.
Allocation change is the percentage-point change in each sector's share of the disclosed portfolio, and can move with prices as well as trades. Position changes compare corporate-action adjusted share quantities at the two disclosures; a change under 0.5% of the existing holding counts as unchanged. Holdings without a sector classification are grouped as Unclassified.
Institutional Conviction
Conviction identifies persistent changes in a fund's disclosed holding quantity across comparable reporting periods. Repeated increases suggest accumulation, while repeated decreases suggest reduction.
Stocks this fund has persistently increased or reduced across its recent disclosures.
Current range: Last 1 Year
6 holdings show persistent accumulation2 show persistent reduction29 are mixed or stableAug 2025 – Aug 2026 · 12 comparable transitions
Conviction signal based on persistent disclosed position changes. Bars show each stock's disclosed share quantity scaled to its own first holding in the range (not portfolio weight), adjusted for splits and bonuses. A move under 0.5% of the existing holding counts as stable.
Fund Quality
Not rated
Sector and thematic funds are not rated against diversified peers.
Fund Quality
Not rated
Sector and thematic funds are not rated against diversified peers.
How Fund Quality works
Each diversified active fund is compared with its current category peers over identical five- and three-year windows, using its Direct Growth plan. Index funds, ETFs and sector or thematic funds are not rated.
Six dimensions are scored 0–100 against peers. Returns, consistency and downside protection carry most of the weight; value for money, portfolio risk and manager stability support them. A dimension without evidence is left out and the rest re-weighted; it is never scored as zero or average.
Great is 85+, Good 70–85, Average 50–70, Poor 30–50 and Awful below 30. Great also needs strong returns, consistency and downside protection and five years of history; weak downside protection caps a fund at Average.
A rating with all three core dimensions and only one supporting dimension is provisional and lower confidence. Without all three core dimensions there is no rating.
Fund Quality is not a return ranking and not a recommendation. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Peers are the plan's current AMFI category; dated category history is not loaded, so a fund that changed category is compared with its current peers throughout.
Closed and merged schemes are not loaded, so peer groups contain survivors only.
No fund-to-benchmark mapping is loaded, so nothing here measures performance against the fund's benchmark.
Manager & process stability is not assessed: its data is not loaded. Mandate discipline is not part of the rating.
Fund Quality describes past evidence. In a 2019–2023 test, funds with higher return, consistency and downside scores did not go on to beat their peers over the next three years.
Past performance and risk do not predict future results. Fund Quality is not a recommendation to buy, sell or switch.
Methodology fund_quality_v1, NAV as of 1 Oct 2026.